Now that ‘Stratospheric Aerosol Injection‘ also known as Geoengineering is in the Public arena,
(MSM Presstitute media) news that the ‘Chemtrail/chemspray’ is debunked is rubbish.
Join the dots ppl – Mick Raven
1. Stories circulating since 2016 debunking ‘chem-spraying’ (that has been going on since 1998) is fake news.
ie:
Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program – IOPscience
Here’s What Scientists Really Think About ‘Chemtrails’ | HuffPost
Surveyed scientists debunk chemtrails conspiracy theory | UCI News | UCI
Science Officially Debunks Chemtrails, But the Conspiracy Will Likely Live On – Smithsonian
Chemtrails conspiracy theory gets put to the ultimate test | New Scientist
My month with chemtrails conspiracy theorists | Environment | The Guardian
Chemtrails Debunked by Atmospheric Scientists – Seeker
2. These are the ‘Scientists’ that the Presstitute media refer to in their articles etc.
Mick West – Wikipedia – Metabunk? mmm I’m not surprised – Mick Raven
Gernot Wagner – Wikipedia – he wrote Climate Shock (2015) funny that – Mick Raven
David Keith – Wikipedia – David Keith also the founder of Carbon Engineering – Wikipedia which incidentally is funded by none other than you guessed it, Mr ‘Dim the Sun’ Bill Gates the eugenicist – Mick Raven
Now do you really believe this one sided ‘mass debate’ the presstitute media is having…at your expense and health!
3. Here is the Good News
Dane Wiginton at Geoengineering Watch is keeping it real check out this video he released, plus Paul Mac at Australia & New Zealand Against Chemtrails & Geoengineering common sense ppl – Mick Raven
“Chemtrails” — How They Affect You and What You Can Do
Chemtrails IS ‘Geoengineering’ ‘Climate change’ IS Global warming – Mick Raven
conspiracyoz 
More links to this Article, oh dear! – Mick Raven
Chemtrails Aren’t the Geoengineering Debate We Should Be Having (Because They Aren’t Real)
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/news/chemtrails-arent-geoengineering-debate-we-should-be-having-because-they-arent-real
Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/publications/solar-geoengineering-and-chemtrails-conspiracy-social-media
Production of Sulfates Onboard an Aircraft: Implications for the Cost and Feasibility of Stratospheric Solar Geoengineering
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/publications/production-sulfates-onboard-aircraft-implications-cost-and-feasibility
Mortality tradeoff between air quality and skin cancer from changes in stratospheric ozone
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/publications/mortality-tradeoff-between-air-quality-and-skin-cancer-changes-stratospheric-ozone
Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/publications/quantifying-impact-sulfate-geoengineering-mortality-air-quality-and-uv-b-exposure
Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target
Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target
Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/publications/tailoring-meridional-and-seasonal-radiative-forcing-sulfate-aerosol-solar
Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/publications/stratospheric-aerosol-injection-tactics-and-costs-first-15-years-deployment
The Risk of Termination Shock From Solar Geoengineering
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/publications/risk-termination-shock-solar-geoengineering
you want more? ok – Mick Raven
Why I am proud to commercialize direct air capture while I oppose any commercial work on solar geoengineering
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/blog/why-i-am-proud-commercialize-direct-air-capture-while-i-oppose-any-commercial-work-solar
The Keith Group
https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/
Chemspraying IS Geoengineering and Climate change IS Global warming – Mick Raven
LikeLike