Net neutrality: US regulators ditch Obama-era rules in move that could recast internet

15th Dec 2017
Photo: Under the Obama-era laws, every website could be accessed at the same speed and price. (ABC News: Malcolm Sutton)

The US Federal Communications Commission has voted to repeal sweeping 2015 net neutrality rules, in a move that gives internet service providers a free hand to slow or block websites and apps as they see fit, or charge more for faster speeds.

Key points:

  • FCC members vote 3-2 along party lines in favour of changes
  • White House says it backs move
  • Consumers and trade groups plan legal challenge

The approval of FCC chairman Ajit Pai’s proposal marked a victory for internet service providers like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon Communications and could recast the digital landscape.

Democrats, Hollywood and companies like Google parent Alphabet and Facebook had urged Mr Pai, a Republican appointed by US President Donald Trump, to keep the Obama-era rules barring service providers from blocking, slowing access to, or charging more for certain content.

Consumer advocates and trade groups representing content providers have planned a legal challenge aimed at preserving those rules.

The White House said it backed the FCC’s move.

“The administration supports the FCC’s efforts and at the same time the White House certainly has and always will support a free and fair internet,” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said.

The FCC meeting was evacuated before the vote for about 10 minutes due to an unspecified security threat, and resumed after law enforcement officers with sniffer dogs checked the room.

New York attorney-general Eric Schneiderman, a Democrat, said in a statement he will lead a multi-state lawsuit to challenge the reversal.

He called the vote “a blow to New York consumers, and to everyone who cares about a free and open internet”.

FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn, a Democrat, said in the run-up to the vote that Republicans were “handing the keys to the internet” to a “handful of multi-billion-dollar corporations”.

Share prices of Alphabet, Apple and Microsoft dropped after the vote.

Mr Pai has argued that the 2015 rules were heavy handed and stifled competition and innovation among service providers.

“The internet wasn’t broken in 2015. We weren’t living in a digital dystopia,” he said.

“To the contrary, the internet is perhaps the one thing in American society we can all agree has been a stunning success.”

The FCC members voted along party lines 3-2 to repeal the rules.

Photo: Protesters have rallied in recent days against the changes. (AP: Mary Altaffer)

No immediate changes expected for consumers

Consumers are unlikely to see immediate changes resulting from the rule change, but smaller start-ups worry the lack of restrictions could drive up costs or lead to their content being blocked.

Internet service providers say they will not block or throttle legal content, but that they may engage in paid prioritisation.

They say consumers will see no change and argue that the largely unregulated internet functioned well in the two decades before the 2015 order.

Democrats have pointed to polls showing a repeal is deeply unpopular and say they will prevail in protecting the rules, either in the courts or in Congress.

FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, said in a written dissent released on Thursday that the decision grants internet providers “extraordinary new power” from the FCC.

“They have the technical ability and business incentive to discriminate and manipulate your internet traffic,” she said.

“And now this agency gives them the legal green light to go ahead.”

Several state attorneys-general said before the vote they would work to oppose the ruling, citing problems with comments made to the FCC during the public comment period.

Other critics have said they will consider challenging what they consider to be weaker enforcement.

The 2015 rules were intended to give consumers equal access to web content and prevent broadband providers from favouring their own content.

Mr Pai proposes allowing those practices as long as they are disclosed.


Posted on December 19, 2017, in ConspiracyOz Posts. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: