Australia, The Meat in the Sandwich? – ConspiracyOz

Tony Abbott confirms US has no plans to send B-1 bombers to Australia, says defence official ‘misspoke’

15th April 2015

Photo: Tony Abbott says the US will not be sending B-1 bombers to Australia. (US Air Force/Staff Sgt Bennie J Davis III)

Prime Minister Tony Abbott says he has been assured United States B-1 bombers are not bound for Australia.

Assistant US defence secretary David Shear told a Congressional hearing B-1 bombers and surveillance aircraft would soon be based in Australia as a deterrent to what America described as China’s “destabilising effect” in the region.

“We will be placing additional air force assets in Australia as well as B-1 bombers and surveillance aircraft,” he said.

The Pentagon now says the assistant secretary misspoke.

“I understand that the official misspoke and that the US does not have any plans to base those aircraft in Australia,” Mr Abbott said.

A spokesperson for the US Embassy in Canberra confirmed the mistake.

“During May 13 testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, US assistant secretary of defence David Shear misspoke on the subject of deploying US military aircraft to Australia,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

“The United States has no plans to rotate B-1 bombers or surveillance aircraft in Australia.

“The United States and Australia continue to explore ways to strengthen our alliance and more effectively respond to shared challenges, both regionally and around the world.

“We routinely rotate military assets through Australia, including a B-52 last December.

“With respect to US force posture initiatives in Australia – which were first announced in 2011 – we are currently exploring a range of options for future rotations with our Australian counterparts, and the specifics of future force posture cooperation have yet to be finalised.”

China will resolutely uphold its territorial sovereignty. We demand the relevant side talk and act cautiously and not take any actions that are risky or provocative to maintain regional peace and stability.

Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying

Before the clarification, China’s foreign ministry expressed “serious concern” with a spokeswoman, saying the country would “resolutely uphold its territorial sovereignty”.

Earlier, a spokesman for Defence Minister Kevin Andrews said the department was “aware of the comments made by a US official in Congressional testimony overnight”.

“The US government has contacted us to advise that the official misspoke,” a statement read.

The US Air Force said the B-1 bomber was the back bone of its long-range bomber force.

The aircraft is capable of rapidly delivering 84 bombs weighing 227 kilograms each “against any adversary, anywhere in the world, at any time” and is currently being used to attack Islamic State in Iraq.

Mr Shear told a special congressional hearing on the South China Sea the deployment of air assets to Australia was in addition to the doubling of US marines bound for Darwin, leaving their current base in Japan.

“We will be moving significant numbers of Marines to Hawaii, Guam and Australia,” he said.

“So we will have a very strong presence, very strong continued posture throughout the region to back our commitments to our allies, to protect and work with our partners and to continue ensuring peace and stability in the region.

“As well as back our diplomacy vis-a-vis China on the South China Sea.”

The senate foreign relations committee called the hearing to address concerns about China’s continued construction of artificial land masses in the South China Sea including runways.

The US State Department said China’s behaviour was having a destabilising effect on the region.

To maintain peace do not take provocative actions: China

China’s official news agency Xinhua reported the country’s ambassador to the US as saying Washington had no right whatsoever to intervene in the legitimate activities it conducted in the South China Sea, while urging related parties to resolve the disputes through diplomatic channels.

Features of the B-1 bomber:

  • Manufactured by Boeing
  • Has the largest internal payload of any current bomber
  • Capable of rapidly delivering 84 227-kilogram bombs
  • Intended for high-speed, low-altitude penetration missions
  • Entered into service in 1986 in United States Air Force as a nuclear bomber
  • Is no longer armed with nuclear weapons, but is capable of carrying air launch cruise and short-range attack missiles

Chinese ministry of foreign affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a press conference in Beijing the country was “extremely concerned”.

“We think the United States has to issue a clarification about this. China has always upheld freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, but freedom of navigation certainly does not mean that foreign military ships and aircraft can enter another country’s territorial waters or airspace at will,” she said.

“China will resolutely uphold its territorial sovereignty.

“We demand the relevant side talk and act cautiously and not take any actions that are risky or provocative to maintain regional peace and stability.”

US secretary of state John Kerry is meeting with China’s leader Xi Jinping this weekend.

Committee chair Republican senator Bob Corker said the US was not doing enough to deter the Chinese and American allies were questioning Washington’s credibility.

“I think we’re the ones paying the price by no-one seeing any kind of tangible activity relative to this and them actually gaining and paying no price,” he said.

Australia’s force posture agreement with the US does mention “enhanced aircraft cooperation initiatives”.

The focus of that though is “visits for exercises and training”.

It does not specifically mention B-1 bombers being stationed in Australia as a deterrent to China’s territorial claims or being based and operationally prepared to respond to Chinese actions in the South China Sea.

A Pentagon spokesman told the ABC heavy-lift bomber assets had been deployed to Australia in the past, including a B52 visit last December.

Those however, were used for a training exercise.

Earlier, a Pentagon spokesman said “the specifics of future force posture cooperation are yet to be finalised”.

Advertisements

Posted on May 15, 2015, in ConspiracyOz Posts. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. This Comment was priceless – Mick Raven

    truthfind
    4:17 PM on 15/05/2015
    This ‘slip of tongue’ by a very senior US official was very unfortunate for the US but very likely to be true. The B1 bomber is modified for stealth and designed for offence. It is understandably viewed as a threat by our neighbors and the Chinese. The US is already antagonizing the Russians by surrounding Russia with NATO bases. The US is also technically at war with Iran and other ‘terrorist states. Now the US wants to take on China because the US wants to maintain its world hegemony. The question we need to ask is would we be better off working constructively with countries like China, Indonesia, Vietnam and Russia while remaining friends with the US and Europe or whether it is better to gang up with the US and allow more and more US troops and weaponry to be based in Aus and so become a target for countries like China who feel threatened by the US. There will be a huge fight between China and the US for dominance. There are people in the US prepared to go to war with China in order to maintain US economic and world military dominance. It is hard to see how that huge US military can be prevented from taking action by any president in the future. Are we better off being more neutral in this fight for power or to continue to make ourselves a big target. There is no guarantee that the US would be able to defeat China unless the US used nukes. The US could not defeat China in a conventional war today or into the future. Australia could become the meat in the sandwich.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: